CONTENTS

    Top 5 Mobile Attribution Software for Boosting App Performance in 2025

    avatar
    alex
    ·September 16, 2025
    ·8 min read
    Cover
    Image Source: statics.mylandingpages.co

    If you’re choosing a mobile measurement partner (MMP) in 2025, you’re navigating two big shifts: Apple’s AdAttributionKit (AAK) rolling out alongside SKAdNetwork (SKAN) on iOS, and Google’s Privacy Sandbox on Android gaining steam with the Attribution Reporting API. Apple has emphasized that AAK and SKAN can operate in parallel and be measured together, with updates through iOS 18-era releases and WWDC sessions describing new capabilities like testing tools and re-engagement measurement, per the latest guidance in the 2024–2025 cycle (see Apple’s overview in the 2025-updated “Measuring ad performance with AdAttributionKit and SKAdNetwork” and WWDC sessions: WWDC24 “Meet AdAttributionKit” and WWDC25 updates). On Android, Google has pushed the Privacy Sandbox forward into Android 16 milestones, with event- and aggregate-level reports designed to replace deterministic ID-based tracking over time, as outlined in Google’s 2024–2025 developer documentation for Attribution Reporting and the Android 16 release notes.

    This list ranks the top five MMPs for 2025 by how well they meet these privacy-era realities, with clear pros/cons, pricing notes, and buyer-fit guidance.

    How we chose (methodology and weights)

    We evaluated vendors against six weighted criteria:

    • Privacy-framework readiness (SKAN 4/5, AdAttributionKit, Android Privacy Sandbox) — 30%
    • Fraud prevention depth & efficacy — 20%
    • Integrations & ecosystem (ad networks, analytics, BI/ETL) — 15%
    • Reporting/ROI analytics & usability — 15%
    • Pricing accessibility & transparency — 10%
    • Support, documentation, and reliability — 10%

    What we used as evidence:

    • Primary platform docs and sessions from Apple and Google on AAK/SKAN and Privacy Sandbox
    • Vendor help centers and product pages for implementation details and feature depth
    • Independent roundups and analyses (SplitMetrics, AppAgent, MobileAction, Segwise, Business of Apps) for market context and buyer considerations

    Key 2025 glossary (fast refresher):

    • ATT (App Tracking Transparency): iOS permission framework limiting user-level tracking without consent.
    • SKAdNetwork (SKAN): Apple’s privacy-preserving install/event attribution with aggregated postbacks.
    • AdAttributionKit (AAK): Apple’s newer framework running alongside SKAN, with enhancements like expanded re-engagement and testing tools (see Apple’s WWDC 2024/2025 sessions listed above).
    • Privacy Sandbox on Android: Google’s privacy-preserving attribution with event-level and aggregate reports, documented in the Attribution Reporting API guides.

    Pricing note: Where specific numbers aren’t published, we indicate “custom/enterprise.” All pricing is subject to change.

    The ranked list: Top 5 MMPs for 2025

    1) AppsFlyer — Enterprise-grade coverage with standout privacy-framework support

    • Standout features

      • Comprehensive SKAN 4 tooling and configuration via Conversion Studio, with clear setup guidance in the AppsFlyer help center (see the SKAN solution guide and Conversion Studio).
      • Active analysis and support content for AdAttributionKit and Android Privacy Sandbox, including the comparative breakdown in AppsFlyer’s SKAN vs Sandbox explainer (2025).
      • Advanced anti-fraud stack (Protect360) with real-time blocking and post-attribution analysis, documented in the Protect360 guide.
      • Deep integrations and data exports (Data Locker, cost ETL, cohort dashboards) across a large partner ecosystem.

    • Pros

      • Category-leading coverage of iOS frameworks (SKAN+AAK) and Privacy Sandbox readiness with active knowledge sharing.
      • Mature fraud prevention and rich network integrations, including SRNs.
      • Extensive reporting and data pipelines suitable for large BI motions.

    • Cons / watch-outs

      • Pricing is enterprise-oriented; may be expensive for early-stage teams.
      • Complexity requires strong internal ownership for full value.

    • Best for / Not for

      • Best for: Large gaming, consumer, and global apps with complex stacks and strict fraud requirements.
      • Not for: Indie/startup teams on tight budgets.

    • Pricing notes

      • Custom/enterprise. Contact sales.

    • Useful references: AppsFlyer’s SKAN vs Sandbox analysis (2025) and the Protect360 anti-fraud guide.

    2) Adjust — Privacy-forward with robust tooling across iOS and Android

    • Standout features

    • Pros

      • Strong privacy posture and documentation; widely adopted across regulated or brand-sensitive verticals per independent roundups like SplitMetrics’ MMP overview and MobileAction’s comparison.
      • Solid fraud prevention capabilities and global footprint cited consistently in market analyses.

    • Cons / watch-outs

      • Pricing tends to be enterprise/custom; upfront transparency can be limited.
      • Some advanced raw-data and BI features may require higher tiers.

    • Best for / Not for

      • Best for: Brands needing strong compliance narratives, reliable global operations, and clear SKAN playbooks.
      • Not for: Teams prioritizing transparent self-serve pricing over enterprise packages.

    • Pricing notes

      • Custom/enterprise. Contact sales.

    • Useful references: Adjust’s SKAN quickstart and Privacy Sandbox terminology.

    3) Singular — Unified spend + attribution analytics with strong anti-fraud

    • Standout features

    • Pros

      • Strong ROI analytics tying cost and attribution, helpful for growth teams balancing many channels.
      • Detailed anti-fraud capabilities with transparent documentation.

    • Cons / watch-outs

      • Exact integration counts and some BI specifics are marketing-site level; confirm during evaluation.
      • Pricing is not publicly listed; scope and tiers require sales conversations.

    • Best for / Not for

      • Best for: Data-driven growth teams seeking unified cost+attribution analytics without stitching many tools.
      • Not for: Teams that need the absolute broadest partner marketplace out-of-the-box without validation.

    • Pricing notes

      • Custom/enterprise. Contact sales.

    • Useful references: Singular’s fraud protection methods and WWDC 2025 AAK blog.

    4) Kochava — Flexible enterprise analytics with cross-channel reach and fraud tooling

    • Standout features

      • Early and ongoing AAK adoption with SKAN coexistence discussed in Kochava’s AAK FAQ and WWDC 2025 takeaways.
      • Active work on Android Privacy Sandbox (Attribution Reporting API, SDK Runtime) per Kochava’s Sandbox blog explainer.
      • Robust Fraud Console with investigation tooling for click flooding, ad stacking, high-volume IP/device anomalies (see fraud console docs and related pages).
      • Broad partner ecosystem including CTV/OTT; regular product and partner updates.

    • Pros

      • Strong cross-channel and advanced fraud controls for enterprise environments.
      • Clear public documentation on fraud heuristics and privacy framework progress.

    • Cons / watch-outs

      • Interface and setup can feel heavy for lean teams.
      • Pricing not publicly available.

    • Best for / Not for

      • Best for: Enterprises with complex channel mixes (including CTV/OTT) and in-house analysts.
      • Not for: Small teams wanting quick self-serve onboarding and transparent pricing.

    • Pricing notes

      • Custom/enterprise. Contact sales.

    • Useful references: Kochava’s AAK FAQ and Privacy Sandbox overview.

    5) Tenjin — Budget-friendly choice for gaming and startups with transparent pricing

    • Standout features

      • Straightforward SKAN reporting and guidance for smaller teams; Tenjin has covered SKAN 4 mechanics in a Q&A with product leadership (SKAN 4 Q&A).
      • Clear public pricing with free and low-cost tiers suitable for testing and early scale (Tenjin pricing).
      • Practical integrations for gaming ad networks and ROAS workflows (e.g., Unity Ads ROAS setup).

    • Pros

      • Easiest on-ramp for indie and early-stage teams due to transparent, low-cost tiers.
      • Focused features for mobile gaming attribution and cost aggregation.

    • Cons / watch-outs

      • Android Privacy Sandbox support status isn’t clearly confirmed in public resources we checked; verify roadmap with sales.
      • Fraud prevention depth may be lighter than enterprise-grade suites; confirm needs.

    • Best for / Not for

      • Best for: Indie/startup teams, mobile games with modest budgets, and teams needing quick SKAN coverage.
      • Not for: Enterprises with advanced privacy, fraud, and BI requirements.

    • Pricing notes

      • Public tiers (subject to change): Free up to 2,000 conversions/month, then $0.04 per additional conversion; All-Inclusive plan $200/month (10,000 conversions) or $2,000/year; Enterprise custom — per Tenjin pricing.

    • Useful references: Tenjin’s pricing page and SKAN 4 Q&A.

    Also great (niche strengths)

    • Branch — Deep linking and web-to-app journeys

      • Why choose it: Best-in-class deep linking and cross-platform routing; can sit alongside a traditional MMP for richer web-to-app measurement. See Branch’s guidance on MMP selection questions in their own blog and developer docs for SDK overviews and advanced compliance.
      • Pricing: Not public; contact sales.

    • Airbridge — Privacy-centric challenger MMP

      • Why choose it: Strong feature set including deep linking, fraud detection options, raw data export, and notable security certifications (SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27017/27018) listed on Airbridge’s security & privacy pages. Features and deep linking options are outlined on the pricing/features page.
      • Pricing: Not public; contact sales.

    Quick comparison (at a glance)

    VendoriOS SKAN 4/AAK readinessAndroid Privacy Sandbox posturePricing transparencyTypical best fit
    AppsFlyerMature SKAN tooling; AAK content and updates availableActive analysis and collaboration contentEnterprise/customLarge gaming & consumer apps, complex stacks
    AdjustClear SKAN 4 guides; ongoing AAK educationActive Privacy Sandbox education and updatesEnterprise/customPrivacy-sensitive verticals, global brands
    SingularSKAN supported; AAK blog updatesLive testing with clients (confirm GA)Enterprise/customROI-focused teams needing unified spend+attribution
    KochavaAAK FAQ + WWDC updates; SKAN coexistenceActive work/testing on SandboxEnterprise/customEnterprise cross-channel, CTV/OTT
    TenjinPractical SKAN content for smaller teamsTBD publicly (verify roadmap)Transparent public tiersIndie/startups, gaming

    Citations: See vendor docs linked in each item; platform frameworks from Apple (AAK/SKAN) and Google (Privacy Sandbox) are linked in the introduction.

    Which MMP fits your use case?

    • Gaming at scale (UA budgets across many networks)

      • Choose: AppsFlyer, Adjust, Singular, or Kochava. They pair SKAN/AAK support with deep fraud prevention and BI exports. Independent roundups like SplitMetrics’ overview and AppAgent’s guide commonly highlight these four for complex gaming stacks.

    • Global consumer apps (commerce, subscriptions, fintech)

      • Choose: Adjust or AppsFlyer for privacy posture and global support; consider Singular if you want unified spend+attribution governance.

    • Web-to-app-heavy funnels (paid social + SEO + CRM)

      • Choose: Pair your MMP (e.g., Adjust or AppsFlyer) with Branch for best-in-class deep linking and onboarding flows, per Branch’s own MMP selection questions.

    • Indie/startups (limited budgets, fast setup)

      • Choose: Tenjin for the free/low-cost tiers and straightforward SKAN support; evaluate Airbridge if you need more features with a privacy-forward posture.

    Buying checklist (30-minute evaluation ritual)

    • Privacy frameworks

      • iOS: Ask to see a unified report combining SKAN 4 and AAK data. Request sample flows for re-engagement and testing tools (as highlighted in Apple’s 2024–2025 sessions referenced above).
      • Android: Confirm current support level for the Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API and migration guidance in 2025.

    • Fraud prevention

      • Request a demo of real-time blocking, post-attribution analysis, and partner postbacks. Ask for examples of defense against click flooding, SDK spoofing, and TTI anomalies.

    • Integrations & data exports

      • Verify ad network and SRN coverage you actually buy. Check ETL/Data Lake connectors and daily cost ingestion fidelity.

    • Reporting & usability

      • Walk through cohort/ROAS dashboards, creative aggregation, and troubleshooting tools.

    • Pricing & contracts

      • Map your monthly installs/events to pricing tiers. Check for overage fees, data export limits, and add-on costs.

    • Support & documentation

      • Review help center depth, implementation guides, and SLAs. Ask for customer references in your vertical.

    Next steps

    • Shortlist two vendors and run a 2–4 week proof of concept (POC) in parallel, sending a consistent subset of traffic to both via SDK or server-to-server, while validating SKAN/AAK aggregation and early Privacy Sandbox reporting.
    • Create a measurement scorecard aligned to the criteria above (weights included), and have each team (UA, data, engineering) score independently before consolidating.
    • If your growth strategy is primarily web/ecommerce today but you’re planning an app later, you might start with a web attribution analytics stack and add a mobile MMP when you launch the app. For that web-first stage, consider exploring Attribuly to unify ecommerce marketing journeys. Disclosure: Attribuly is our product.

    Sources and further reading

    Retarget and measure your ideal audiences

    Start Free Trial
    Attribuly
    Home

    © Copyright 205 Attribuly Inc. - All Rights Reserved.