CONTENTS

    Key Fashion Industry Benchmarks for 2025: What Brands Need to Know

    avatar
    alex
    ·September 25, 2025
    ·8 min read
    Cover
    Image Source: statics.mylandingpages.co

    If you run growth, e‑commerce, or brand at a fashion company, 2025 is a “measure smarter or spend blind” year. Growth is uneven, upper‑funnel channels are harder to value with privacy changes, and new sustainability rules will force better data discipline. The headline: use benchmarks to prioritize, but measure contribution (not vanity) and segment by your price tier and geography. McKinsey/BoF’s 2025 outlook expects low single‑digit growth and a shift toward value segments, with AI‑led discovery and social commerce shaping demand, as summarized in the K3 recap of the State of Fashion 2025 (McKinsey/BoF, 2025) — see the concise trends in the K3 summary of State of Fashion 2025.

    Below is a practitioner’s guide to the most useful 2025 benchmarks across e‑commerce, social/influencers, lifecycle marketing, sustainability/regulation, and operations — plus how to act on them with an attribution‑first workflow.

    How to use benchmarks in 2025 (before diving into the numbers)

    • Segment your peer set. Luxury, premium, and value apparel perform differently. Compare yourself to brands with similar price points, product mix, and regions.
    • Normalize for net contribution. Track CVR, AOV, and ROAS net of returns and shipping. A 22% return rate can erase thin gains fast.
    • Separate leading vs. lagging indicators. Engagement and CTR are useful but only when you see their assisted conversion and LTV impact.
    • Use ranges, not single targets. Seasonality and promotions swing fashion metrics more than most categories.
    • Revisit quarterly. Benchmarks shift. Treat them as living guardrails, not fixed grades.

    E‑commerce performance benchmarks (and what to do with them)

    These are directional ranges I’ve seen hold up across audits of fashion stores from <$10M to $250M GMV. Your mileage will vary by assortment, geography, and discount cadence.

    • Conversion rate (sitewide): 1.9%–3.6% for apparel, with top performers reaching ~4.7%. Category nuances: women’s fashion often ~3.6%, men’s lower; accessories can be higher. For 2025 ranges and vertical splits, see the Centra fashion conversion benchmarks (2025).

      • Do this next: Break CVR by traffic source x landing template x intent (e.g., product‑page landers from TikTok vs. SEO). Fix the worst‑performing pairs first (often PDP speed, sizing clarity, and first‑time offer friction).

    • Average order value (AOV): often $100–$150 for fashion in Shopify ecosystems; desktop tends to skew higher. For a detailed view across Shopify stores, use the Red Stag Shopify AOV analysis (2024–2025).

      • Do this next: Bundle adjacent items (accessories with core garments), offer free shipping thresholds just above your median AOV, and test product set merchandising on PDP and cart.

    • Cart abandonment: 70%–75% is common in fashion. The ClickPost e‑commerce returns and abandonment statistics (2025) provide a helpful sanity check.

      • Do this next: Remove checkout friction (guest checkout, shop pay options), show total costs early, and run 2‑step abandonment flows (email first, then SMS for high‑intent segments).

    • Repeat purchase rate: ~25%–26% is typical for apparel (slightly below the broader e‑commerce average).

      • Do this next: Merchandise by lifecycle. Push accessories and replenishable basics in weeks 2–6 post‑purchase; reserve deep discounts for churn‑risk cohorts only.

    • LTV:CAC ratio: Target 3:1 to 5:1 depending on margin. Validate with multi‑touch attribution (more on implementation below).

      • Do this next: Model LTV by first product purchased and price tier. You’ll usually find profitable CAC expansion room in high‑margin accessory intros.

    Common traps: chasing aggregate CVR while channel mix shifts toward upper‑funnel discovery; ignoring margins and return costs in AOV gains; and interpreting cart abandonment without considering shipping/return policy clarity.

    Social and influencer benchmarks (plus how to translate them into ROI)

    Organic engagement ranges for fashion accounts in 2025:

    Paid ranges vary significantly by audience and creative, but for planning:

    • TikTok Ads: indicative CPMs around low‑to‑mid teens; CPCs often $0.10–$0.50+.
    • Instagram (Reels) Ads: indicative CPMs roughly in the low teens; CPCs ~$0.20–$0.70 is common.

    How to act on these numbers:

    • Benchmark by format and objective. Compare TikTok Spark Ads vs. in‑feed; Reels vs. Stories; and measure assisted conversions within 7–30 days.
    • Scale creators by tier, not just cost. Nano/micro creators often deliver higher engagement rates; negotiate content usage rights and retarget creator viewers with platform pixels.
    • Always triangulate cost with contribution. Track “cost per 100% video view” and “cost per engaged view,” then connect those exposures to assisted conversions in attribution.

    Signals you’re on the right track: stable or falling CPMs with rising engaged‑view rates; creator whitelisting lifting account‑level relevance; and upper‑funnel touchpoints showing meaningful assist rates in blended ROAS.

    Email and SMS benchmarks (and frequency guardrails)

    Email still pulls weight in fashion, especially for launches and back‑in‑stock.

    • Email (retail/fashion): open rates in the low‑to‑high 30s, click rates around 1%–3%, and modest placed‑order rates on campaigns. Klaviyo’s 2025 dataset puts averages clearly; see the Klaviyo email marketing benchmarks (2025).

      • Do this next: Separate launch/collection drops from evergreen content. Use dynamic segments (first‑time vs. repeat; full‑price vs. promo) and holdouts to measure incremental lift.

    • SMS (campaigns): 2025 bands useful for sanity checks — “Great” click ≥14.6% and conversion ≥2.1%; unsub “Great” <0.5%. See the Klaviyo SMS/MMS benchmark bands (updated 2025).

      • Do this next: Cap weekly sends by cohort (e.g., 1–2 to new signups, 0–1 to at‑risk unsub cohorts). Use price‑drop and waitlist automations before blanket blasts.

    What not to do: blast every list for every drop. Watch unsub bands and spam complaint rates. If unsub creeps into “Room” or “Critical,” pause blasts, rebuild intent (on‑site capture, creator collabs), and return with higher‑relevance automations.

    Sustainability and regulatory benchmarks (what to prep in 2025)

    Beyond marketing, 2025 is a compliance planning year. Even if you’re not in the first CSRD wave, you’ll feel downstream data demands.

    • CSRD (EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive): First reports for large companies start in 2025 (covering FY2024), with phased adoption thereafter. Read the official European Commission CSRD overview (2025).

      • Do this next: Map data owners for emissions, materials, suppliers, and due diligence. Create a lightweight data schema you can grow into (product, supplier, process, and transport attributes).

    • ESPR and Digital Product Passport (DPP): ESPR entered into law in 2024; DPP requirements for textiles are slated to finalize by late 2025, with compliance timelines following. For an implementation‑focused explanation, see Intertek’s ESPR/DPP explainer (2025).

      • Do this next: Pilot a DPP data model on a single collection. Assign unique IDs and capture composition, care, origin, and end‑of‑life info you can expose via QR.

    • Emissions/materials targets: Many brands work toward 1.5°C‑aligned reductions by 2030 and higher recycled content shares. Translate this into quarterly metrics you can actually control (e.g., % of SKUs with recycled materials, % tier‑1 suppliers with renewable energy commitments).

    What to avoid: marketing sustainability claims you can’t substantiate. With “green claims” enforcement evolving, treat every claim like it needs an audit trail.

    Operational benchmarks (returns, delivery, and cost discipline)

    • Returns rate: 20%–25% is a realistic band for apparel, among the highest categories. For context and recent patterns, see the ClickPost e‑commerce return statistics (2025).

      • Do this next: Tag return reasons by product and customer cohort. Improve fit guidance, set clearer expectations on materials and care, and test paid returns for low‑margin items to reduce abuse without hurting NPS.

    • Delivery time and reliability: 2–7 days is common depending on geography; >90% on‑time should be your target with a multi‑node 3PL.

      • Do this next: Adopt delivery‑date messaging at PDP and checkout, and measure delivery promise accuracy. Use post‑purchase comms to preempt WISMO and reduce cancellations.

    • Fulfillment cost guardrails: 10%–15% of revenue is common in fashion given shipping + returns. Push to the lower end with weight‑optimized packaging, zone‑skipping, and thoughtful free‑shipping thresholds tied to AOV.

    Most teams under‑measure the compounding effect: return rate x shipping x discounting. Put these into your contribution margin model so marketing targets align with operations reality.

    Implementation workflow: turning benchmarks into budget decisions

    Here’s the practical sequence that has worked across fashion brands from early‑stage DTC to multi‑region retailers:

    1. Identity resolution and clean tracking. Unify known and unknown visitors across Shopify, Meta, Google, TikTok, email, and web events. Implement server‑side tracking (Meta CAPI, Google Enhanced Conversions) to minimize signal loss.
    2. Define model + windows. Use position‑based or data‑driven attribution to value upper‑funnel assists (e.g., 1/7/30/60/90‑day windows by funnel stage). Avoid defaulting to last‑click.
    3. Journey and cohort views. Segment by first product viewed, price tier, and content source; track assisted conversions and LTV by cohort, not just by channel.
    4. Close the loop. Build audiences (e.g., “viewed high‑margin accessories but no cart”) to trigger creative and lifecycle steps in ads, email, and SMS. Iterate weekly.

    Example tool workflow (non‑promotional): Many teams operationalize this with an attribution platform. Using Attribuly to unify journeys and run multi‑touch attribution is one way to implement the steps above in a fashion context. Disclosure: Attribuly is our product. For advanced readers who want to go deeper on model configuration and practical trade‑offs, see the multi‑touch attribution overview.

    Practical guardrails:

    • If TikTok and creators rarely win last‑click, inspect their 7–30‑day assist rate before cutting budget.
    • Audit your attribution against contribution margin (net of returns and shipping). Some channels lift AOV enough to justify higher CAC.
    • Log every change (creative, targeting, landing) with dates, so you can attribute performance shifts to actions, not seasonality.

    Common pitfalls and trade‑offs when using 2025 benchmarks

    • Comparing to the wrong peers. Luxury vs. value vs. sportswear have different CVR/AOV/returns profiles. Build your own peer set before judging performance.
    • Over‑reacting to CPM/CPC. Rising costs can still yield better ROAS if your creative lifts engaged‑view rates and CVR. Tie media metrics to contribution, not just clicks.
    • Last‑click blind spots. Social and creator content often introduce, not close. Without position‑based models, you’ll underfund growth drivers.
    • Ignoring returns and delivery in ROI. AOV gains are meaningless if the items come back or arrive late. Bake returns and on‑time delivery into channel targets.
    • Over‑sending email/SMS. If unsubscribe rates cross Klaviyo’s “Good” bands into “Room/Critical,” pull back and reset with higher‑intent automations.
    • Compliance debt. CSRD/DPP requirements won’t wait for your roadmap. Start data capture on a pilot collection now to avoid rushed retrofits.

    A quarterly benchmarking cadence you can copy

    Use this 6‑step loop every quarter; adjust for seasonality.

    1. Define your peer set and targets
    • Price tier, geography, and category mix
    • Targets for CVR, AOV, repeat rate, returns, ROAS (by channel)
    1. Audit tracking and attribution
    • Verify server‑side events and consented IDs
    • Reconfirm model and windows; sanity‑check assists vs. last‑click
    1. Diagnose gaps and opportunities
    • Compare each KPI to the 2025 ranges above
    • Identify 3 bottlenecks (e.g., PDP speed, sizing confusion, SMS fatigue)
    1. Run focused experiments
    • Creative: new hooks for Reels/TikTok; creator whitelisting
    • Merchandising: bundles, threshold shipping, UGC on PDP
    • Lifecycle: cart/waitlist flows; win‑back by margin segment
    1. Align ops and sustainability
    • Returns root‑cause analysis; delivery promise accuracy
    • DPP/CSRD data capture on one pilot collection
    1. Review and reallocate
    • Shift budget toward channels with rising assisted conversions and improving contribution
    • Update targets based on new ranges and seasonality

    Final word

    Benchmarks are not scores; they’re directional guardrails to focus effort. In 2025, the winning fashion teams combine clear KPI targets with rigorous attribution, lifecycle discipline, and early compliance groundwork. Measure what matters, adapt each quarter, and let contribution — not vanity — decide your budget.

    References for the specific figures above:

    Retarget and measure your ideal audiences

    Start Free Trial
    Attribuly
    Home

    © Copyright 205 Attribuly Inc. - All Rights Reserved.